Reply To: 2017 NSR Porsche 917 Rules discussion

Home Forums Club Races Racing Calendar, Classes & Regulations 2017 NSR Porsche 917 Rules discussion Reply To: 2017 NSR Porsche 917 Rules discussion

#10607
Avatar photoBarkingSpyder
Participant

    a) I suggest we clearly define what is an “irregularity”.

    b) We should also consider them in regards to importance for (i) Technical fairness [i.e. does it clearly provide a technical advantage] (ii) authenticity of appearance or conformance to 1×1.

    c) I suggest we vote on the rules – at least as a ‘feedback’ to the series manager.

    Basically, if I am going to be dinged for cosmetics or a minor technical variance – I need to know in advance b/c otherwise I am f’ed.  Speaking of such, if someone’s car is clearly several hundredths ahead of others (say, as tested by a netural 3rd party) it should be looked at – not necessarily DQ’ed.  But if the car is hundredths slower – wtf is the impact of a variance, esp., if it may actually be a negative-advantage.

    "... get on your bad motor scooter and ride!"
    Sammy with Montrose

    Avatar photo

    BarkingSpyder

    At 4-years old in Pensacola I repaired my steering linkage on my Ford Pedal-car. Dad later converted this car to a Blue Angel with ailerons and elevators with a working "stick/yoke"; the rudder was controlled by the steering wheel. I like all motorsports - I grew up going to a NASCAR Feeder track with Sportsman and Modified classes, and was lucky to attend drag races in 1970 at Orange County Raceway. My first solder-iron was a Christmas gift at 9yo; I modified T-Jets to be AFX spec before AFX Cars were in local stores. I rebuilt a few tractor & car (SIMCA) engines plus transmissions by 15yo (I still have my ring-compressor and valve spring tool) I am a former mountain and road bike geek & perennial sound engineer. Struggling guitar hobbyist and Amp "tweeker"